• Blueprint 5-year plan
    • Why a 5-year plan?
    • What is Blueprint?
    • Products for Blueprint
    • Progression maps
    • KS3 Syllabus
    • Kickstart Tools
    • Knowledge structure
    • Mastery assessment
    • Thinking processes
    • Scientific thinking processes
    • 5A’s learning pathway
    • Curriculum time
    • Unit planners
    • Year 7 units
  • Mastery Practice Books
    • Details & pricing
    • Buy the books
    • Answers (GCSE /Y9 Book)
    • Apply thinking process
    • Support material
  • CPD
    • Kickstart your 5-year plan
    • Science Done Right Conference
  • Blog
    • Bad teaching
    • 5-year curriculum
    • Mastery
  • About
    • About us
    • Privacy policy
  • Contact
  • Login
    • Join
  • Shop

Mastery Science - for the big ideas, 5-year science curriculum to GCSE and beyond

Adopt a well-designed big ideas curriculum for science. Free 5-year plan for GCSE, with high assessments, practice and teaching materials.

You are here: Home / Bad teaching / Bad teaching #1

May 18, 2018

Bad teaching #1

Science is hard enough. But when the textbooks and resources mess up it’s no wonder students get confused. These posts are not only for entertainment, but also to remind the curriculum developers amongst us about important principles of teaching and learning. Do contact us with any instructive mistakes you’ve found.

Bird-brain balanced forces

In the Balanced forces animation from Kerboodle (OUP), it shows a bird on the branch and says the forces are balanced. Then another bird comes, it says the forces are unbalanced, and the branch breaks. What’s wrong?

It’s a classic mistake in physics. A force diagram is supposed to represent forces on one object only. In this example they are mixing up the forces on two objects – the bird and the branch.

In the first diagram the bird is in equilibrium. But in the second diagram, they say that the combined weight of the two birds acts on the branch. Of course they’re right that it breaks but the explanation is confusing.

The more general point is that we need to teach concepts rigorously if students are to understand them. That means making explicit all the important details. Textbooks often contain one brief example, a few recall questions, and assume that’s enough to give students the concept. Wishful thinking in our view.

Print Friendly

Article by Tony / Bad teaching 1 Comment

Comments

  1. Comment from Matt (teacher) says

    May 19, 2018 at 11:43 AM

    This really is a poor example – the breaking branch situation would be better suited to moments. I cannot see that the branch would break to the right of either bird as the force diagram suggests.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

2019 Science Done Right Conference

Recent Comments

  • Hugh Gough on Progression maps
  • Tony on Progression maps
  • Hugh Gough on Progression maps
  • Tony on Progression maps

Recent posts

  • Register for Science Done Right Conference 2019 January 4, 2019
  • 6 changes teachers are making to the curriculum July 15, 2018
  • New teaching & assessment materials June 28, 2018
  • “Carrotgate” or how to avoid fragile knowledge May 23, 2018

© 2019 Mastery Science - for the big ideas, 5-year science curriculum to GCSE and beyond · Rainmaker Platform